Message250426
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
desbma, martin.panter, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2015年09月10日.22:31:57 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1441924317.95.0.65514198492.issue25063@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I agree it is a nice idea, but have the same concern as David. Many pseudo file objects wrap real file descriptors. E.g. BufferedReader hides unread data in a buffer, GzipFile decompresses data, HTTPResponse decodes chunks. Detecting when sendfile() is appropriate would be hard to do. And I understand some platforms only support sockets.
Also I notice that 3.5 has a new socket.sendfile() method (Issue 17552), which partly overlaps with this proposal. BTW the 3.4 os documentation should not mention the socket method, but it does! |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年09月10日 22:31:57 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, r.david.murray, desbma |
| 2015年09月10日 22:31:57 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1441924317.95.0.65514198492.issue25063@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年09月10日 22:31:57 | martin.panter | link | issue25063 messages |
| 2015年09月10日 22:31:57 | martin.panter | create |
|