Message250107
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, aconrad, belopolsky, larry, mark.dickinson, python-dev, r.david.murray, tbarbugli, tim.peters, trcarden, vivanov, vstinner |
| Date |
2015年09月07日.12:56:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1441630599.78.0.0669517848521.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> All you need to do is to revert a few chunks of 1e9cc1a03365 where the regression was introduced.
Hum, please don't revert this change. I spent a lot of days to write pytime.c/.h.
My patches add more unit tests to datetime, to test the exact rounding mode.
> Well, for now I assume it really truly genuinely isn't going in 3.5.0. I suppose we can debate about 3.4.x and 3.5.1 later, once we have a fix everybody is happy with.
The rounding mode of microseconds only impact a very few people. The rounding mode changed in 3.3, again in 3.4 and again in 3.5. This issue is the first bug report. So I think it's fine to modify 3.4.x and 3.5.x. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年09月07日 12:56:39 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, belopolsky, larry, r.david.murray, aconrad, BreamoreBoy, vivanov, python-dev, tbarbugli, trcarden |
| 2015年09月07日 12:56:39 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1441630599.78.0.0669517848521.issue23517@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年09月07日 12:56:39 | vstinner | link | issue23517 messages |
| 2015年09月07日 12:56:39 | vstinner | create |
|