Message249986
| Author |
njs |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, barry, berker.peksag, brett.cannon, eric.snow, josh.r, jwilk, larry, ncoghlan, njs, serhiy.storchaka, takluyver, zach.ware |
| Date |
2015年09月06日.09:04:15 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1441530256.72.0.145735386173.issue24305@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Also just checked searchcode.com, which allows more fine-grained queries, and it reports ~6500 hits for "stacklevel=2" and exactly 0 for "stacklevel=8".
<refreshes, sees new post>
Huh. So the official word is that requiring stacklevel=8 on 3.4 is not a bug, rather all those modules are buggy? I've been telling people who asked to just leave the stacklevel=2 thing alone rather than adding version-specific conditionals, but I guess I can pass that on. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年09月06日 09:04:16 | njs | set | recipients:
+ njs, barry, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, larry, jwilk, Arfrever, eric.snow, takluyver, berker.peksag, zach.ware, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r |
| 2015年09月06日 09:04:16 | njs | set | messageid: <1441530256.72.0.145735386173.issue24305@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年09月06日 09:04:16 | njs | link | issue24305 messages |
| 2015年09月06日 09:04:15 | njs | create |
|