Message249603
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
Garfield222, Lukasa, Pierre.Tardy, adambrenecki, berker.peksag, christian.heimes, demian.brecht, icordasc, jitterman, lonetwin, martin.panter, orsenthil, pitrou, r.david.murray, raymondr, serhiy.storchaka, stamparm |
| Date |
2015年09月03日.04:40:22 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1441255222.9.0.491016944884.issue17849@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I still don’t think the test case is a reasonable example. According to <http://www.w3.org/Protocols/HTTP/AsImplemented.html>, HTTP 0.9 only supported GET, not CONNECT, and doesn’t include any header fields in the protocol (such as your X-Foo: bar). It would make more sense to me to adjust the check at <https://hg.python.org/cpython/file/69ea73015132/Lib/httplib.py#l813> to also check for version == "HTTP/0.9". That would probably eliminate the need to mess too much with the details of the LineAndFileWrapper class.
But if you wanted to parse the CONNECT response as a HTTP 0.9 response, I think you should not try to parse any header, because that will tend to skip over the start of the actual response.
Also, I assume the change to "configure" is unrelated. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年09月03日 04:40:22 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, orsenthil, pitrou, christian.heimes, r.david.murray, berker.peksag, serhiy.storchaka, stamparm, icordasc, demian.brecht, adambrenecki, raymondr, Lukasa, lonetwin, Pierre.Tardy, jitterman, Garfield222 |
| 2015年09月03日 04:40:22 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1441255222.9.0.491016944884.issue17849@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年09月03日 04:40:22 | martin.panter | link | issue17849 messages |
| 2015年09月03日 04:40:22 | martin.panter | create |
|