homepage

Python 3.5 suffers from a vulnerability caused by the behavior of the time_strftime() function. When called, the function loops over the format string provided, using strchr to search for each instance of '%'. After finding a '%', it continues to search two characters ahead, assuming that each instance is the beginning of a well formed format string token.
However, if a string ends with '%', this logic will result in a call to strchr that reads off the end of the format string buffer:
 /* check that the format string contains only valid directives */
 for(outbuf = strchr(fmt, '%'); <<<< Assuming fmt ends with a '%', this will return a pointer to the end of the string.
 outbuf != NULL;
 outbuf = strchr(outbuf+2, '%')) <<<< Once outbuf is pointing to the end of the string, outbuf+2 skips
 { past the null terimnator, leading to a buffer over-read.
 if (outbuf[1]=='#')
 ++outbuf; /* not documented by python, */
 if ((outbuf[1] == 'y') && buf.tm_year < 0)
 {
 PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError,
 "format %y requires year >= 1900 on Windows");
 Py_DECREF(format);
 return NULL;
 }
 }
In some applications, it may be possible to exploit this behavior to disclose the contents of adjacent memory. The buffer over-read can be observed by running the following script:
from time import *
strftime("AA%"*0x10000)
Which, depending on the arrangement of memory, may produce an exception such as this:
0:000> g
(20b8.18d4): Access violation - code c0000005 (first chance)
First chance exceptions are reported before any exception handling.
This exception may be expected and handled.
eax=ffffffff ebx=52c1a6a0 ecx=00000000 edx=08ef3000 esi=08ec2fe8 edi=08ec2ff8
eip=52d254f3 esp=004cf9d4 ebp=004cfa58 iopl=0 nv up ei pl nz na pe nc
cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00010206
python35!strchr+0x33:
52d254f3 f30f6f0a movdqu xmm1,xmmword ptr [edx] ds:002b:08ef3000=????????????????????????????????
0:000> db edx-0x10
08ef2ff0 41 25 41 41 25 41 41 25-00 d0 d0 d0 d0 d0 d0 d0 A%AA%AA%........
08ef3000 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??-?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ????????????????
08ef3010 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??-?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ????????????????
08ef3020 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??-?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ????????????????
08ef3030 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??-?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ????????????????
08ef3040 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??-?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ????????????????
08ef3050 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??-?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ????????????????
08ef3060 ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ??-?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ?? ????????????????
0:000> k5
ChildEBP RetAddr 
004cf9d0 52c1a7f6 python35!strchr+0x33 [f:\dd\vctools\crt\vcruntime\src\string\i386\strchr_sse.inc @ 75]
004cfa58 52c832d3 python35!time_strftime+0x156 [c:\build\cpython\modules\timemodule.c @ 615]
004cfa74 52ce442f python35!PyCFunction_Call+0x113 [c:\build\cpython\objects\methodobject.c @ 109]
004cfaa8 52ce18ec python35!call_function+0x2ff [c:\build\cpython\python\ceval.c @ 4651]
004cfb20 52ce339f python35!PyEval_EvalFrameEx+0x232c [c:\build\cpython\python\ceval.c @ 3184]
To fix this issue, it is recommended that time_strftime() be updated to check outputbuf[1] for null in the body of the format string directive validation loop. A proposed patch is attached.
Credit: John Leitch (johnleitch@outlook.com), Bryce Darling (darlingbryce@gmail.com)