This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | cgohlke |
|---|---|
| Recipients | cgohlke, larry, lemburg, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware |
| Date | 2015年08月17日.06:13:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1439792033.41.0.841024762223.issue24872@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The matplotlib extensions compiled with Python 3.5.0rc1 (/MT) are larger than those compiled with 3.5.0b4 (/MD). The C++ runtime is statically linked. This seems undesirable for the same reasons the UCRT is not linked statically. In "Introducing the Universal CRT" [1] James McNellis "strongly recommend against static linking of the Visual C++ libraries, for both performance and serviceability reasons". In "Visual Studio 2015 RTM Now Available" [2] the same author commented that one "may deploy the Universal CRT app-locally". Do these comments not apply to CPython? [1] <http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2015/03/03/introducing-the-universal-crt.aspx> [2] <http://blogs.msdn.com/b/vcblog/archive/2015/07/20/visual-studio-2015-rtm-now-available.aspx> |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015年08月17日 06:13:53 | cgohlke | set | recipients: + cgohlke, lemburg, paul.moore, larry, tim.golden, zach.ware, steve.dower |
| 2015年08月17日 06:13:53 | cgohlke | set | messageid: <1439792033.41.0.841024762223.issue24872@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年08月17日 06:13:53 | cgohlke | link | issue24872 messages |
| 2015年08月17日 06:13:52 | cgohlke | create | |