Message248460
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
Chris Smowton, Ingo Ruhnke, berker.peksag, christian.heimes, doko, gnarvaja, introom, r.david.murray, rblank |
| Date |
2015年08月12日.15:24:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1439393060.51.0.166182516225.issue23906@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
If maxline is too small, messages won't get through. If maxline is too large *huge* messages will get through...and the DDOS danger of exhausting the server's resources will occur. So, we really ought to provide a way to limit the maximum message size *anyway*...at which point a separate maxline value doesn't make any sense, since the RFC specifies no maximum line size.
I'm much more comfortable setting a large maximum message size than setting a large enough maximum line size to permit that size of message consisting of mostly a single line. Since we aren't going to back out the DDOS fix, we have to put the limit *somewhere*. At least in 3.6 we can make it easy for the application to set it. (Programs using earlier versions will just have to monkey-patch, unfortunately...which they have to do right now anyway.) |
|