Message247270
| Author |
alex.gronholm |
| Recipients |
alex.gronholm, gvanrossum, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date |
2015年07月24日.11:45:06 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1437738307.26.0.0197959915604.issue24383@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yes, Yury's approach is wrong here -- Futures should not know about asyncio, but asyncio should be able to handle Futures natively. This seems like the obvious solution to me. Any counterarguments? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年07月24日 11:45:07 | alex.gronholm | set | recipients:
+ alex.gronholm, gvanrossum, scoder, vstinner, yselivanov |
| 2015年07月24日 11:45:07 | alex.gronholm | set | messageid: <1437738307.26.0.0197959915604.issue24383@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年07月24日 11:45:07 | alex.gronholm | link | issue24383 messages |
| 2015年07月24日 11:45:06 | alex.gronholm | create |
|