Message246416
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou, srkunze, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date |
2015年07月07日.15:14:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1436282092.44.0.0999089529466.issue24571@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
But that example also shows what's wrong with the idea. I presume load_remote_data_set1 and load_remote_data_set2 are themselves just using synchronous I/O, and the parallelization is done using threads. So why not use concurrent.futures? Why bother with asyncio at all? |
|