Message245295
| Author |
rbcollins |
| Recipients |
barry, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, r.david.murray, rbcollins, taleinat |
| Date |
2015年06月13日.06:43:10 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1434177790.9.0.429410237119.issue24412@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
It would be nice for symmetry. I mean, setUpClass isn't needed either, and we have it ;).
however, we actually have two contexts this would be called from - setUpClass and setUpModule; both share their internals. So we probably need a decoupled cleanups implementation, and two new binding points to it. |
|