Message244965
| Author |
bobcatfish |
| Recipients |
Fotis.Koutoulakis, bobcatfish, docs@python, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, martin.panter, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, seydou |
| Date |
2015年06月07日.18:25:29 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1433701529.44.0.528125522094.issue18576@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> If you diffed your patch from a public revision in the main repository, there should be a nice "Review" link.
Ah, thanks @vadmium!!! I've been confused about why some patches get review links and others do not >.<
I'll have a new patch up shortly which is diffed against a public revision and has your suggested changes.
> For autodoc in particular, we prefer to avoid it for the main docs because "good docstring" and "good prose documentation" don't necessarily look alike.
@ncoghlan for some reason I thought that the main docs were also auto generated from docstrings in the actual modules, but I can see now that that isn't the case.
I'll reach out to docs@python.org to see how they feel about autogenerating the test.support docs. |
|