Message244090
| Author |
serhiy.storchaka |
| Recipients |
eric.snow, jab, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2015年05月26日.08:09:30 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1432627770.93.0.730668522081.issue24286@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I don't know if it is worth to backport this feature (dict views were registered in 1f024a95e9d9), but the patch itself LGTM. I think tests should be foreported to 3.x (if they don't exist in 3.x).
Are there generic set tests similar to mapping_tests and seq_tests? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年05月26日 08:09:30 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients:
+ serhiy.storchaka, rhettinger, jab, eric.snow |
| 2015年05月26日 08:09:30 | serhiy.storchaka | set | messageid: <1432627770.93.0.730668522081.issue24286@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年05月26日 08:09:30 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue24286 messages |
| 2015年05月26日 08:09:30 | serhiy.storchaka | create |
|