Message242921
| Author |
paul.moore |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, christian.heimes, lemburg, paul.moore, steve.dower, tim.golden, zach.ware |
| Date |
2015年05月11日.21:50:12 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1431381012.59.0.354225035786.issue23970@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I agree with Steve, we shouldn't be constrained to preserve all the undocumented internals of distutils - doing that in the past is what has made distutils essentially unmaintainable.
I don't think there's a concrete example of real code that will be broken by this change - if I follow the comments correctly, MAL's code will still work ("I guess we'll then just continue to override the .initialize() call"). Without a specific breakage that can't be fixed to work with the new code, I don't think this patch should be blocked just because people might be using the old internals. |
|