Message242146
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
belopolsky, ethan.furman, mark.dickinson, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, skrah, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2015年04月27日.19:02:14 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1430161334.13.0.213021883262.issue24053@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> I want people to standardize on status=1 for a generic failure code.
Why that? Multiple error codes can be used by the same program, depending on the kind of error.
> I want discourage people from using computed integer results as exit status.
Ok, that's the first good argument for this feature. Although I would encourage people raise an exception if they want to signify a failure, rather than simply change the error code. |
|