Message241624
| Author |
ionelmc |
| Recipients |
Claudiu.Popa, belopolsky, christian.heimes, eric.snow, ethan.furman, ionelmc, jedwards, llllllllll, r.david.murray, rhettinger, steven.daprano, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2015年04月20日.08:43:13 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CANkHFr8VcX-JrtwN1Hq=jgStMYutoAD5EkiVMxBM5ZuPHiwKfw@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1429502547.13.0.338529314806.issue23990@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Raymond Hettinger <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:
> AFAICT, there isn't a real problem here and the API for better-or-worse
> has proven to be usable in practice (the callable() API has been around
> practically forever and the descriptor protocol has been around since Py2.2
> -- if there were a real issue here, it would have reared it head long ago).
I think this is largely a product of misunderstanding the issue. As you
can see in the early comments in the thread, the fact that special methods
use descriptors is really really obscure.
Thanks,
-- Ionel Cristian Mărieș, http://blog.ionelmc.ro |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年04月20日 08:43:14 | ionelmc | set | recipients:
+ ionelmc, rhettinger, terry.reedy, belopolsky, christian.heimes, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, Claudiu.Popa, ethan.furman, eric.snow, llllllllll, jedwards |
| 2015年04月20日 08:43:13 | ionelmc | link | issue23990 messages |
| 2015年04月20日 08:43:13 | ionelmc | create |
|