Message240698
| Author |
mcjeff |
| Recipients |
gregory.p.smith, mcjeff, vstinner |
| Date |
2015年04月13日.18:25:27 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1428949527.84.0.308083856139.issue23863@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Actually, never mind that suggestion. Now that I think a bit more about it, that actually doesn't do anything since I'd still need to set the updated timeout on the current socket object anyway. Whoops.
I'll leave it up to you as to whether we go with an approach like this as is or not. I'm happy to change the approach if there's a better one. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年04月13日 18:25:27 | mcjeff | set | recipients:
+ mcjeff, gregory.p.smith, vstinner |
| 2015年04月13日 18:25:27 | mcjeff | set | messageid: <1428949527.84.0.308083856139.issue23863@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年04月13日 18:25:27 | mcjeff | link | issue23863 messages |
| 2015年04月13日 18:25:27 | mcjeff | create |
|