Message239815
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
docs@python, ezio.melotti, martin.panter, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, skrah |
| Date |
2015年04月01日.14:01:44 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1427896905.09.0.892062765857.issue23756@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I found the explanation of C-contiguous vs Fortran-contiguous helpful (and I've programmed in both of those languages, though granted not much :). However, based on that it is not obvious to me why having a fortran-contiguous buffer prevents it from being used in the bytes-like object contexts (though granted the order might be surprising to someone who is not thinking about the memory ordering and just assuming C).
I don't have much of an opinion on the other non-glossary-entry changes, but at a quick read I'm not sure how much clarity they add, if any. |
|