Message237802
| Author |
davin |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, davin, jnoller, sbt, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2015年03月10日.19:26:57 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1426015617.67.0.99980158514.issue21779@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Yes, setting -Werror::ResourceWarning would indeed cause the test to fail again.
A couple of options we could potentially adopt:
1. Decide to ignore anything extra in the file anytime any kind of "error" filterwarning is present.
2. Decide to ignore anything extra in the file anytime "-Werror" is used because that is arguably the dominant, most common scenario where this issue comes up.
3. Decide that certain kinds of -Werror::SomeParticularWarning are worth paying attention to and others are not.
4. Decide that the ResourceWarning from _io itself needs to be properly dealt with.
Of those options, I do not like #1 and I think #3 is a slippery slope to step onto -- this patch pragmatically offers us #2 with the potential to pursue #4 (which is ultimately where I think we want this to go). I kind of like the thought of someone specifying -Werror::ResourceWarning and getting to see this test fail. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年03月10日 19:26:57 | davin | set | recipients:
+ davin, jnoller, BreamoreBoy, sbt, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2015年03月10日 19:26:57 | davin | set | messageid: <1426015617.67.0.99980158514.issue21779@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年03月10日 19:26:57 | davin | link | issue21779 messages |
| 2015年03月10日 19:26:57 | davin | create |
|