Message237778
| Author |
vstinner |
| Recipients |
NeilGirdhar, belopolsky, brett.cannon, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2015年03月10日.16:37:50 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1426005470.51.0.307685622474.issue23595@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Ok, fair enough, I abandon my change.
I agree that a partial implementation of math.py (only a few functions) is not useful. To implement more math functions, struct and ctypes modules are probably needed. But it sounds overkill, since CPython already has a full implementation of math written in C.
It's quite easy to implement the math module for other Python implementations (Jython, IronPython, PyPy, etc.). So I agree that math.py is useless. We all want a super fast (optimized) math module ;-) |
|