Message 237333 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	mark.dickinson
Recipients	NeilGirdhar, belopolsky, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, vstinner
Date	2015年03月06日.08:22:23
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1425630144.16.0.015190620578.issue23595@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
> I'm not sure that the C implementation of factorial() is much faster The inner loop (see the for loop in factorial_partial_product) operates on C unsigned longs, so I'd be surprised if a Python implementation were competitive. But it would be interesting to see timings.

Content

> I'm not sure that the C implementation of factorial() is much faster
The inner loop (see the for loop in factorial_partial_product) operates on C unsigned longs, so I'd be surprised if a Python implementation were competitive. But it would be interesting to see timings.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015年03月06日 08:22:24	mark.dickinson	set	recipients: + mark.dickinson, gvanrossum, belopolsky, vstinner, ezio.melotti, ethan.furman, NeilGirdhar
2015年03月06日 08:22:24	mark.dickinson	set	messageid: <1425630144.16.0.015190620578.issue23595@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015年03月06日 08:22:24	mark.dickinson	link	issue23595 messages
2015年03月06日 08:22:23	mark.dickinson	create

homepage