Message236747
| Author |
pitrou |
| Recipients |
martin.panter, nikratio, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date |
2015年02月27日.13:39:42 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1425044382.89.0.81126331591.issue23529@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> LZMAFile now uses BufferedReader.peek(). The current implementation seems appropriate, but I am not comfortable with the current specification in the documentation, which says it is allowed to not return any useful data.
What do you mean with "useful data"? peek() should always return at least one byte (except on EOF or on non-blocking streams, of course). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年02月27日 13:39:42 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, nikratio, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2015年02月27日 13:39:42 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1425044382.89.0.81126331591.issue23529@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年02月27日 13:39:42 | pitrou | link | issue23529 messages |
| 2015年02月27日 13:39:42 | pitrou | create |
|