Message236140
| Author |
rschoon |
| Recipients |
berker.peksag, docs@python, pje, rschoon |
| Date |
2015年02月17日.17:55:47 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1424195747.36.0.487064838995.issue18610@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'm not sure I follow, as it has little to say on whether the application's expected behavior here, and only a recommendation that the server allow it. But, it also defers to the "Python Standard Library", which does have an opinion. I feel that (in hindsight) the exact behavior of each method should have been specified in full.
*However*, even if I differ on the reading of the spec, on general principle (and this has changed since I first wrote the issue) I agree that the application should not be omitting it anyway, because reading the entire response at once without checking the content length is dangerous. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年02月17日 17:55:47 | rschoon | set | recipients:
+ rschoon, pje, docs@python, berker.peksag |
| 2015年02月17日 17:55:47 | rschoon | set | messageid: <1424195747.36.0.487064838995.issue18610@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年02月17日 17:55:47 | rschoon | link | issue18610 messages |
| 2015年02月17日 17:55:47 | rschoon | create |
|