This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | akira |
|---|---|
| Recipients | abacabadabacaba, akira, alexei.romanov, benhoyt, giampaolo.rodola, josh.r, pitrou, socketpair, tebeka, tim.golden, vstinner |
| Date | 2015年02月13日.21:58:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1423864705.57.0.0257800406341.issue22524@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
As I've mentioned in http://bugs.python.org/issue22524#msg231703 os.walk size 7925376343, scandir.walk size 5534939617 -- NOT EQUAL! os.walk and scandir.walk do a different work here. I don't see that it is acknowledged so I assume the benchmark is not fixed. If the fixed (same work) benchmark is used then there is no performance difference on Linux. See the attached file http://bugs.python.org/file37292/get_tree_size_listdir.diff Note: the performance improvements on Windows along should be enough to accept os.scandir() even if Linux version won't be improved (if the behavior is documented). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2015年02月13日 21:58:25 | akira | set | recipients: + akira, tebeka, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, tim.golden, benhoyt, abacabadabacaba, socketpair, josh.r, alexei.romanov |
| 2015年02月13日 21:58:25 | akira | set | messageid: <1423864705.57.0.0257800406341.issue22524@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年02月13日 21:58:25 | akira | link | issue22524 messages |
| 2015年02月13日 21:58:25 | akira | create | |