Message235155
| Author |
rhansen |
| Recipients |
pitrou, rhansen, seberg, skrah |
| Date |
2015年02月01日.09:39:42 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1422783583.0.0.227532114486.issue23352@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
My preference is to apply the patch, of course. There is a legitimate concern that it will break existing code, but I think there are more points in favor of applying the patch:
* there exists code that the current behavior is known to break
* it's easier to remove assert(view->suboffsets == NULL) than to
change producers to not provide an all-negative array (though I
admit there may be other more subtle ways the patch would break
existing code)
* I may be the only one who has spoken up about this, but I doubt
I'm the only one who has experienced it |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2015年02月01日 09:39:43 | rhansen | set | recipients:
+ rhansen, pitrou, skrah, seberg |
| 2015年02月01日 09:39:43 | rhansen | set | messageid: <1422783583.0.0.227532114486.issue23352@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2015年02月01日 09:39:42 | rhansen | link | issue23352 messages |
| 2015年02月01日 09:39:42 | rhansen | create |
|