Message233483
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, pitrou, vstinner, xdegaye, yselivanov |
| Date |
2015年01月05日.23:18:26 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1420499906.83.0.263917366364.issue23140@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
The patch looks good, although the test feels overly complex (but maybe I'm missing something).
I'm okay with leaving the other unguarded set_result() call unchanged, but I'm also okay with putting "if not self.waiter.cancelled():" around it. |
|