This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gvanrossum, martin.panter, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2014年12月17日.00:27:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAMpsgwa_KtSAVD6F1F7821NQG8V1s9EvpUKwO_QLmKrOiQg=9Q@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <CAP7+vJKuLZp2g1qB0mRcCvpKpJE+2yxpHXx1jea74fmoccN_zw@mail.gmail.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> why was Server there at all? Tests? If you cannot answer, who can answer? :-) https://code.google.com/p/tulip/source/detail?r=f136c04d82c0 (You added Server to __all__.) I don't see any use case which needs to create explicitly a Server class. There are the create_server() method and start_server() function for that. By the way, the Server class *is* documented as asyncio.Server, which is the same mistake than asyncio.BaseEventLoop: https://docs.python.org/dev/library/asyncio-eventloop.html#asyncio.Server I propose to update the doc for Server, replace asyncio.Server with asyncio.base_events.Server. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014年12月17日 00:27:58 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, martin.panter, yselivanov |
| 2014年12月17日 00:27:58 | vstinner | link | issue23046 messages |
| 2014年12月17日 00:27:58 | vstinner | create | |