Message232047
| Author |
lemburg |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, barry, brett.cannon, eric.snow, lemburg, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitrou, steve.dower, tim.golden, vstinner, zach.ware |
| Date |
2014年12月02日.19:51:21 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<547E1834.40607@egenix.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<547E0EA8.6000704@free.fr> |
| Content |
On 02.12.2014 20:10, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> Le 02/12/2014 19:59, Marc-Andre Lemburg a écrit :
>>
>> My main point was that we shouldn't start adding tags for e.g.
>> PPC, Intel, ARM, etc. since platforms needing to support multiple
>> such architectures will typically support fat builds anyway.
>>
>> How about using these flags:
>>
>> b0 - 16-bit
>> b1 - 32-bit
>> b2 - 64-bit
>> b3 - 128-bit
>
> Fair enough, although I think we only need 32-bit and 64-bit for now,
> and "32b" vs. "64b" would probably be more readable :-)
True, I'm just not sure what the parsing requirements are and
the ABI version names are too long already, IMO. PEP 425 used
a nice short variant for the Python part. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年12月02日 19:51:22 | lemburg | set | recipients:
+ lemburg, barry, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, tim.golden, ned.deily, Arfrever, eric.snow, zach.ware, steve.dower |
| 2014年12月02日 19:51:22 | lemburg | link | issue22980 messages |
| 2014年12月02日 19:51:21 | lemburg | create |
|