Message232040
| Author |
lemburg |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, barry, brett.cannon, eric.snow, lemburg, ncoghlan, ned.deily, pitrou, steve.dower, tim.golden, vstinner, zach.ware |
| Date |
2014年12月02日.18:44:21 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<547E0881.7080009@egenix.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1417545657.4.0.177414865595.issue22980@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On 02.12.2014 19:40, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> I was more interested in source file resolution than bytecode caching. If Python 3.5 would prefer "spam.cpython-35.py" or "spam.cpython-3.py" over "spam.py" and Python 2 preferred "spam.py", then I can more easily separate the code that won't parse in the alternative.
>
> Happy to be told it's unrelated and I should raise it separately, but from my POV resolving .pyd filenames looks very similar to resolving .py files.
That's an interesting idea, but indeed unrelated to this ticket :-) |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年12月02日 18:44:21 | lemburg | set | recipients:
+ lemburg, barry, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, tim.golden, ned.deily, Arfrever, eric.snow, zach.ware, steve.dower |
| 2014年12月02日 18:44:21 | lemburg | link | issue22980 messages |
| 2014年12月02日 18:44:21 | lemburg | create |
|