Message231973
| Author |
demian.brecht |
| Recipients |
Waldemar.Parzonka, demian.brecht, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2014年12月02日.02:23:46 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1417487028.7.0.433889068501.issue22931@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Attached patch to fix the issue as reported.
Something interesting that came out of this though is that due to the regex expression, if there's an invalid character in one of the cookie-octets, the rest of the cookie is ignored. I would assume that it should either a) ignore the entire cookie string or b) ignore the invalid cookie pair and accept valid pairs following. I've been unable to find that defined in any of the RFCs though. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年12月02日 02:23:48 | demian.brecht | set | recipients:
+ demian.brecht, r.david.murray, Waldemar.Parzonka |
| 2014年12月02日 02:23:48 | demian.brecht | set | messageid: <1417487028.7.0.433889068501.issue22931@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014年12月02日 02:23:48 | demian.brecht | link | issue22931 messages |
| 2014年12月02日 02:23:48 | demian.brecht | create |
|