Message230971
| Author |
pebenito |
| Recipients |
ncoghlan, pebenito, pitrou, pmoody |
| Date |
2014年11月10日.20:08:25 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1415650105.76.0.50386944461.issue22800@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I understand the resistance; I'm fine closing this as "won't implement", though this is not for academic use. In a nutshell, my package currently has a set of classes to represent an SELinux policy, and the SELinux policy language represents networks with extended netmask[1]. I control the package, so I can change the internal representation from extended netmask to CIDR, so it's not the end of the world.
[1] example statement: nodecon ff00:: ff00:: system_u:object_r:multicast_node_t |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年11月10日 20:08:25 | pebenito | set | recipients:
+ pebenito, ncoghlan, pitrou, pmoody |
| 2014年11月10日 20:08:25 | pebenito | set | messageid: <1415650105.76.0.50386944461.issue22800@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014年11月10日 20:08:25 | pebenito | link | issue22800 messages |
| 2014年11月10日 20:08:25 | pebenito | create |
|