Message230561
| Author |
ethan.furman |
| Recipients |
eric.araujo, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, python-dev, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2014年11月03日.20:37:18 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1415047038.39.0.213432984086.issue22780@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
+ Special value which should be returned by the special methods
+ (:meth:`__eq__`, :meth:`__lt__`, :meth:`__add__`, etc.) to indicate
+ that the operation is not implemented with respect to the other type.
After a discussion on python-dev, I think this wording could be even clearer. How about:
Special value which should be returned by the binary special methods
(e.g. :meth:`__eq__`, :meth:`__lt__`, :meth:`__add__`, :meth:`__rsub__`,
etc.) to indicate that the operation is not implemented with respect to
the other type; may be returned by the in-place binary special methods
(e.g. :meth:`__imul__`, :meth:`__iand__`, etc.) for the same purpose. |
|