Message230180
| Author |
martin.panter |
| Recipients |
docs@python, evilzero, ezio.melotti, martin.panter, michael.foord, pitrou, rbcollins |
| Date |
2014年10月28日.21:57:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1414533440.13.0.80113365323.issue22153@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Do you mean pretending there is no default "methodName" value, or pretending that the runTest() method is not invoked by discovery?
I would have to check, but I think I have relied on the runTest() method being discovered in the past, when I did not think a more original test method name was useful. Though I agree that it makes the behaviour more complicated for little extra flexibility. |
|