Message229786
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
gvanrossum, vstinner, wabu, yselivanov |
| Date |
2014年10月21日.20:41:59 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAP7+vJ+Uezs0dw2-hwzeRCfB=3mco_k=cEFPk7sffBrM8XpwJg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<5446C428.7090509@fooserv.net> |
| Content |
Victor, do you think this needs a unittest? It seems kind of difficult to
test for whether memory fills up (the machine may get wedged if it does :-).
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:39 PM, wabu <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> wabu added the comment:
>
> thanks a lot, the fix works!
>
> On 21.10.2014 22:16, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >
> > Guido van Rossum added the comment:
> >
> > Can you confirm that this patch fixes the problem (without you needing
> the workaround in your own code)?
> >
> > ----------
> > keywords: +patch
> > Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file36989/fix22685.patch
> >
> > _______________________________________
> > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> > <http://bugs.python.org/issue22685>
> > _______________________________________
> >
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22685>
> _______________________________________
> |
|