Message227363
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
michael.foord, r.david.murray, rbcollins, vstinner |
| Date |
2014年09月23日.14:55:41 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1411484141.59.0.494155513791.issue19746@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Oh, ok, if the existing glue does it that way, then it seems fine. I thought when I read the code that it was holding a reference to the traceback until it raised the error in the synthetic test. Or do you mean that when exceptions are raised by tests it is the string that is captured not the exception? That would make sense. So, yeah, I guess capturing the string makes sense, to be consistent with the rest of the reporting. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年09月23日 14:55:41 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, vstinner, rbcollins, michael.foord |
| 2014年09月23日 14:55:41 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1411484141.59.0.494155513791.issue19746@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014年09月23日 14:55:41 | r.david.murray | link | issue19746 messages |
| 2014年09月23日 14:55:41 | r.david.murray | create |
|