Message227274
| Author |
belopolsky |
| Recipients |
AaronR, Alex.Willmer, BreamoreBoy, Erik Cederstrand, Erik.Cederstrand, aganders3, belopolsky, r.david.murray, tim.peters |
| Date |
2014年09月22日.14:52:34 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1411397554.23.0.523906921052.issue12006@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I find this footnote somewhat confusing:
"""
(8) Similar to %U and %W, %V is only used in calculations when the day of the week and the ISO year (%G) are specified when used with the strptime method.
"""
The existing footnote (7) is much clearer:
"""
(7) When used with the strptime() method, %U and %W are only used in calculations when the day of the week and the year are specified.
"""
Why not use the same language in (8)?
"""
(7) When used with the strptime() method, %V is only used in calculations when the day of the week and the ISO year (%G) are specified.
""" |
|