Message227218
| Author |
gvanrossum |
| Recipients |
ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, mrabarnett, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2014年09月21日.15:48:37 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<CAP7+vJJEkoEcjQEDA+pFpgkFED45GkRD5wyUfKFtwbPa0y0zxg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to |
<1411301556.53.0.370228869919.issue22434@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
OK, then if you want to review Serhiy's original patch that would be great.
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Antoine Pitrou <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:
>
> Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
>
> I think I agree with Serhiy. Augmenting the import dependencies from the
> re module can have side effects. While the alternative (a custom Int
> subclass) isn't extremely pretty, it does the job.
>
> NamedIntConstant should be private, though.
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22434>
> _______________________________________
> |
|