Message226412
| Author |
Sjlver |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, Sjlver, bfroehle, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, pitrou, tarek |
| Date |
2014年09月05日.09:48:22 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1409910505.04.0.964360259347.issue5309@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Is there a reason this has not landed? The patch works perfectly for me, except for one issue:
@@ -268,6 +275,9 @@
if self.undef:
self.undef = self.undef.split(',')
+ if self.parallel:
+ self.parallel = int(self.parallel)
+
if self.swig_opts is None:
self.swig_opts = []
else:
If self.parallel is True, this will set self.parallel to 1, causing it to use one worker instead of n (where n is the number of processors).
An updated patch is attached. |
|