Message226070
| Author |
terry.reedy |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, docs@python, jj, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2014年08月29日.19:52:20 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1409341941.13.0.642066146019.issue22270@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I agree that this is a bad idea.
1. Cookies are generally a nuisance. I like the fact that docs.python.org is (apparently) cookie free and that python sites only use a few short-lived cookies. The complications you propose would be a nuisance to create and maintain.
2. Not too long ago, we created docs.python.org/2/ and /3/ so people can use generic links to the latest docs for the latest released version of either Python 2 or 3. The aim was to reduce the problem of links to stale docs. Both sets of docs have version added notes for changes within a series. Those two docs are not interchangeable and should not be automatically switched.
If someone links now to a fixed version of the docs, they are either ignorant of the new system *or* they have a purpose that should not be over-riden.
If someone quotes or paraphrases a portion of a page (which is a claim about what the page says) or otherwise makes a claim about Python, and posts a link as evidence of the claim, clicking the link should take one to the 'evidence', not one's preferred version. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年08月29日 19:52:21 | terry.reedy | set | recipients:
+ terry.reedy, benjamin.peterson, docs@python, jj |
| 2014年08月29日 19:52:21 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1409341941.13.0.642066146019.issue22270@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014年08月29日 19:52:21 | terry.reedy | link | issue22270 messages |
| 2014年08月29日 19:52:20 | terry.reedy | create |
|