Message 225917 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub , and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

In-reply-to
Author	r.david.murray
Recipients	CristianCantoro, r.david.murray
Date	2014年08月26日.13:20:28
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1409059228.2.0.127109257878.issue22277@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
This seems like a good idea, based on the use case presented in the stackoverflow question. This would be an enhancement, so it can only go in 3.5. Please submit a patch without the pep 8 changes, so we can easily see what the patch is actually changing. As far as the API goes, since the controls are passed to subprocess, might it be a good idea to make the API for these keywords the same as the one subprocess uses?

Content

This seems like a good idea, based on the use case presented in the stackoverflow question.
This would be an enhancement, so it can only go in 3.5.
Please submit a patch without the pep 8 changes, so we can easily see what the patch is actually changing. As far as the API goes, since the controls are passed to subprocess, might it be a good idea to make the API for these keywords the same as the one subprocess uses?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014年08月26日 13:20:28	r.david.murray	set	recipients: + r.david.murray, CristianCantoro
2014年08月26日 13:20:28	r.david.murray	set	messageid: <1409059228.2.0.127109257878.issue22277@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014年08月26日 13:20:28	r.david.murray	link	issue22277 messages
2014年08月26日 13:20:28	r.david.murray	create

homepage