Message225875
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner |
| Date |
2014年08月25日.14:50:42 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1408978242.21.0.0114056940175.issue18814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Right now having has_escaped_bytes isn't too important, since I've done nothing to profile and improve the performance of the new email code. But eventually I'll need it, because detecting the existence of escaped bytes is inside some of the inner loops in the header processing code. "s != s.clean_escaped_bytes()" (or whatever you call it) just smells wrong as a way to spell has_escaped_bytes. |
|