Message224025
| Author |
ncoghlan |
| Recipients |
chris.jerdonek, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, lemburg, martin.panter, ncoghlan, terry.reedy, zach.ware |
| Date |
2014年07月26日.07:44:39 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1406360682.83.0.293958480773.issue21777@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
OK, I've completed the initial pass through all the methods. Remaining items:
* add back the guarantees where str will return the same object, add those guarantees for bytes where applicable
* address the review comments from Zach and Ezio
There are a couple of review comments about removing duplication that I'd like to skip addressing for now. I think they're reasonable ideas, but I also think it's a lot easier to go wrong with DRY in docs than it is in code. Indeed, this whole matter of not documenting the bytes behaviour in the first place was a matter of assuming folks could just infer the binary behaviour from the text behaviour. |
|