Message223401
| Author |
dw |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, dw, hynek, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, stutzbach |
| Date |
2014年07月18日.07:12:03 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1405667523.88.0.300758634107.issue22003@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Good catch :( There doesn't seem to be way a to ask for an immutable buffer, so perhaps it could just be a little more selective. I think the majority of use cases would still be covered if the sharing behaviour was restricted only to BytesType.
In that case "Py_buffer initialdata" could become a PyObject*, saving a small amount of memory, and allowing reuse of the struct member if BytesIO was also modified to directly write into a private BytesObject |
|