Message223311
| Author |
tim.peters |
| Recipients |
alex, arigo, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2014年07月17日.03:10:49 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1405566649.52.0.970942728997.issue21988@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I'm afraid "microoptimizations" aren't worth measuring to begin with, since, well, they're "micro" ;-) Seriously, switch compilers, compilation flags, or move to a new release of a single compiler, and a micro-optimization often turns into a micro-pessimization. If I _want_ to measure something unrolled, I'll unroll it myself. But since I almost never want to measure something unrolled anyway, an option to do so would just be "yet another attractive nuisance" to me. |
|