Message222772
| Author |
mark.dickinson |
| Recipients |
andymaier, benjamin.peterson, chris.jerdonek, cvrebert, docs@python, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, mark.dickinson, mikehoy, rhettinger, steven.daprano, terry.reedy |
| Date |
2014年07月11日.18:13:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1405102380.41.0.1132489152.issue12067@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
+ In other words, the following expressions should have the same result:
+
+ ``x == y`` and ``not x != y``
+
+ ``x < y`` and ``not x >= y``
+
+ ``x > y`` and ``not x <= y``
I think the second and third items here go too far: sets don't obey these rules, for example. Not all uses of comparisons need to force a total ordering.
OTOH, you leave out a more fundamental relation, namely that `x < y` and `y > x` should ordinarily give the same result, as should `x <= y` and `y >= x`. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年07月11日 18:13:00 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, rhettinger, terry.reedy, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, steven.daprano, cvrebert, chris.jerdonek, docs@python, ethan.furman, mikehoy, andymaier |
| 2014年07月11日 18:13:00 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1405102380.41.0.1132489152.issue12067@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014年07月11日 18:13:00 | mark.dickinson | link | issue12067 messages |
| 2014年07月11日 18:13:00 | mark.dickinson | create |
|