This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub ,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | kdavies4 |
|---|---|
| Recipients | docs@python, ezio.melotti, kdavies4, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, stutzbach |
| Date | 2014年07月05日.04:47:54 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <53B78376.9050103@yahoo.com> |
| In-reply-to | <53B774D7.4040303@yahoo.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm not sure what the resolution is (the patch was 'inverse', Mark said he'd be happy to use 'area', and Raymond quoted 'arc'). I didn't know this would be a big deal, and I'm sorry that I caused trouble. But since one of the concerns was divergence, I thought I'd send some info on how the tools I've used describe it -- universally as 'inverse' in those that I found: - Mathematica: ArcCosh[z] "gives the inverse hyperbolic cosine [...]" (http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/ref/ArcCosh.html) - Modelica Standard Library: acosh "Inverse of cosh (area hyperbolic cosine)" (http://reference.wolfram.com/system-modeler/libraries/Modelica/Modelica_Math_acosh.html) - Maple: arccosh, but unknown description (http://www.maplesoft.com/support/help/Maple/view.aspx?path=invtrig) - MATLAB: acosh " Inverse hyperbolic cosine" (http://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/acosh.html) - TI-89 calculator: cosh-1 "returns the inverse hyperbolic cosine [...]" (from manual) Respectfully, Kevin |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014年07月05日 04:47:54 | kdavies4 | set | recipients: + kdavies4, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, stutzbach, ezio.melotti, docs@python |
| 2014年07月05日 04:47:54 | kdavies4 | link | issue21902 messages |
| 2014年07月05日 04:47:54 | kdavies4 | create | |