Message220854
| Author |
zach.ware |
| Recipients |
BreamoreBoy, eric.araujo, kristjan.jonsson, michael.foord, pitrou, r.david.murray, stutzbach, zach.ware |
| Date |
2014年06月17日.18:40:05 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1403030406.09.0.828482983155.issue14534@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Right, but in my experience, it seems like a lot of people do inherit from TestCase in their mixin anyway, possibly just to have the TestCase methods available for auto-completion in their IDE. I've done the same, though I've remembered after writing the tests that I could remove TestCase as a base on the mixin.
On the other hand, I may be getting "base class" and "mixin" confused in this context and completely misunderstanding some aspect of the issue :)
Anyway, my suggestion was just the simplest change I could come up with makes the situation better from my point of view, but I do actually like the decorate-the-base-class method better anyway. |
|