Message220388
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
barry, jesstess, pitrou, r.david.murray, zvyn |
| Date |
2014年06月12日.21:43:40 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1402609421.03.0.661156724364.issue21725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
Correction on the XXX should we check this: I was thinking about the wrong section of the code. But it is still 'no': by postel's law we should accept dirty data. Currently the consumer of the library can then decide whether or not to reject the dirty data by building a subclass. It might be nice to provide an option to control rejection of invalid characters in commands, but that should be a separate issue. (And, we are ending up with so many options that we might want to think about whether or not there is a better API for controlling them). |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年06月12日 21:43:41 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, barry, pitrou, jesstess, zvyn |
| 2014年06月12日 21:43:41 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1402609421.03.0.661156724364.issue21725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014年06月12日 21:43:41 | r.david.murray | link | issue21725 messages |
| 2014年06月12日 21:43:40 | r.david.murray | create |
|