Message218793
| Author |
dmalcolm |
| Recipients |
Robert.Buchholz, bkabrda, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, eric.araujo, fche, jcea, loewis, mjw, pitrou, scox |
| Date |
2014年05月19日.14:15:00 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1400508756.22162.177.camel@surprise> |
| In-reply-to |
<1400497826.25.0.171691741387.issue14776@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content |
On Mon, 2014年05月19日 at 11:10 +0000, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda wrote:
> Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda added the comment:
>
> Hi,
> I'd like to take this over after Dave Malcolm. I don't see any issues that haven't been resolved, so my question is: What else can I do to make this patch acceptable?
> I'm attaching a rebased version of this patch that applies to current default branch (FWIW, we use this patch downstream in Fedora in our python3-debug build and it works well)
>
> ----------
> Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35293/cpython-systemtap-2014年05月19日.patch
Is this attachment missing the "instrumentation.rst"?
There are also a couple of example scripts we ship in the RPMs, iirc. |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年05月19日 14:15:01 | dmalcolm | set | recipients:
+ dmalcolm, loewis, jcea, pitrou, christian.heimes, eric.araujo, mjw, Robert.Buchholz, fche, scox, bkabrda |
| 2014年05月19日 14:15:01 | dmalcolm | link | issue14776 messages |
| 2014年05月19日 14:15:00 | dmalcolm | create |
|