Message218384
| Author |
tim.peters |
| Recipients |
Arfrever, alex, dstufft, ezio.melotti, mark.dickinson, neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date |
2014年05月12日.23:46:52 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1399938412.56.0.710335138173.issue21470@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
> Thanks for the explanation. It's much clearer now.
Maybe, but it's also overblown - LOL ;-) That is, no matter what the starting seed, the user will see a microscopically tiny span of the Twister's entire period. So all those "provably correct" properties that depend on whole-period analysis remain pretty much theoretical no matter what we do.
It's just a "better safe than sorry" thing. |
|