Message217730
| Author |
r.david.murray |
| Recipients |
benjamin.peterson, exarkun, josh.r, r.david.murray |
| Date |
2014年05月01日.21:47:31 |
| SpamBayes Score |
-1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified |
Yes |
| Message-id |
<1398980851.59.0.595676086653.issue21408@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content |
I don't think it's a bug. The subclass-goes-first behavior is very intentional. The implicit __ne__ returning the boolean inverse of __eq__ is what fooled me when I looked at it.
Or did you mean that following the subclass rule in the case where object is the other class is possibly suspect? |
|
History
|
|---|
| Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
| 2014年05月01日 21:47:31 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, exarkun, benjamin.peterson, josh.r |
| 2014年05月01日 21:47:31 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1398980851.59.0.595676086653.issue21408@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014年05月01日 21:47:31 | r.david.murray | link | issue21408 messages |
| 2014年05月01日 21:47:31 | r.david.murray | create |
|